'A Farewell to Arms – Existentialism Essay\r'

'Ernest Hemingway’s ‘A F arewell to weaponry’ explores notions surrounding two love and war. just it is not a love story, and nor is it a war story. It is a combination of both that allows for Hemingway to discuss what he is truly elicit in: Existentialism. Existentialism is a doctrine that developed from the concept that on that point is no inherent convey in life. stock-still, we toilette create moment.\r\nA Farewell to weapons system is an exploration of this, however more than that, it’s an exploration of the reality of this in that; message in life doesn’t conk forever, and when it’s gone, it leaves us with no logic and no hope, just nothingness. Hemingway uses his protagonist Frederic enthalpy to support his existentialist views. He does this, first of all by creating meaning in Frederic’s life. Hemingway creates Catherine for him. Their love is only a enlivened at first, Frederic admits â€Å"God knows [he] had no t treasured to fall in love with eitherone.\r\n” However, it becomes so much more than that. Towards the culmination of the novel, if Catherine isn’t with him he â€Å"[hasn’t] a thing in the world”. Hemingway makes a point of point this inevitable fact early on, when we are privy to Frederick’s thoughts as he contemplates that â€Å"It was a long snip since [he] had scripted to the States and [he] knew [he] should write but [he] had let it go so long that it was almost unfeasible to write now. ” Throughout the book, the people he associates with; Rinaldi, the men in his regiment, everyone, they all disappear.\r\nFinally, he’s left wing with Catherine, and their unborn baby. separate than them, he has no one. If they were to leave, he would be left alienated. Hemingway was not interest in the love story, or the war story. He was merely interested in communication his views on the world to his readers. Predominantly, he was in terested in communicating his views on existentialism. He was interested in what he considered to be reality. In reality, people die. In reality, our love ones leave us, and in reality, when that happens there is no meaning, no logic and no hope.\r\nHemingway demonstrates this through with(predicate) the climactic, yet painfully dismal stopping point to his piece. In bringing about the surmise that Catherine, Frederic’s only meaning in life, could die, he creates a springboard for discussing his philosophic views through Frederic. This forces us, as an listening, to contemplate upon his broil; â€Å"That was what you did. You died. You did not know what it was about. You never had time to learn. They threw you in and told you the rules and the first time they caught you glowering base they killed you…\r\nthey killed you in the end. You could count on that. ” Hemingway uses his protagonist to establish this, and through Frederic’s reaction to Cather ine’s death, he reveals to us the truth within his philosophy. It’s a point that is slowly built up to within A Farewell to Arms, but it’s one that hits Hemingway’s audience with a sounding resonance. The conclusion blood to his novel conveys the perfect, dismal imagery of a homo with nothing left; a man who has â€Å"left the hospital and walked a sacktha to the hotel in the rain”.\r\nThroughout the upstanding novel ‘rain’ has symbolised loss and grief. It leaves a strong impression, making it the final net word of the novel, Frederic having now lost the last thing that made his life worthwhile. Hemingway’s entire novel is a die up to this one point on existentialism. The world has no inherent meaning. We can create meaning within it, and any meaning that is within it has been created by us. However on the flip side of that, when the meaning that we have created is gone, there is nothing left for us to fall back on.\r\nW hen that meaning is gone, we’re left staring into an abyss. A Farewell to Arms is not a love story, and it’s not a war story either. It’s a comment upon the actuality of, and the nature of, existentialism as a prevailing philosophy. By creating Frederic and the characters roughly him, Hemingway demonstrates the logic of this theory, and he shows how when a man loses everything that he has created himself, in his life, in the end there is no more meaning, there is no logic, no hope. In the end, there is really nothing left, but the rain. Kaitlin Cushing.\r\n'