Future of democracy Essay

narrow res publica is a clay of administration in which the citizens are kept in the dark roughly the conduct and activities of powerful officials in the government due to the absence of obliging liberties. Despite the existence of elective space in a country, the order of magnitude becomes an un-open society. Such situations arise in cases where despite the existence of a democratic constitution that limits the powers of government, its liberties are not taken into consideration by the feeling class due to insufficiency of strong constitutional legal framework.Illiberal democratic regimes feel that they flummox the right to act in whichever focusing they feel is best provided that regular elections are held. Such governments may jaw rules which interfere with the individual liberties such as the alleviatedom of assembly and speech, make it difficult for opposition forces to succeed in criticizing it (Zakaria 2007). There is a unsubtle range of illiberal democratic gov ernments. They range from those dictatorial governments to those governments that are well democratic.An illiberal democracy regime can be determined finished observing the nature in which the government carries its elections. If a government does not carry out regular, free, competitive and fair elections when filling its principle brass instrument positions, then it can be classified as an illiberal democracy government according to the yearly freedom house ratings. Around the globe, democratically elected governments have gone beyond their limits and deprived their citizens their rights which are provided for in the constitution.Countries such as the Philippines and Peru are some of the countries with illiberal democratic governments. check to Zakaria (2008), democracy that has no constitutional liberalism produces centralized governments, eroded liberty, conflicts, war and pagan competition. There are a wide range of implications of liberalism to the foreign policy. First, it is a guarantee for humility. Although it can be easier for elections to be imposed on a country, it will be difficult to impose constitutional liberalism to a society. honest democratization and liberalization is a process which is long-term and gradual in nature that an election acts as a step towards achieving its overall goal. Without the requirement precautions being taken, such an election can end up being a false step towards the process. This has prompted nongovernmental organizations together with various governments to put in place measures that are aimed at promoting constitutional liberalisms in countries which are in the process of becoming developed (Zakaria 2007).National democracy endowment fosters main(a) labor unions together with policy-making voiceies and in addition run intos that at that place are free markets. Independent judiciaries are funded by the USA through the International outgrowth Agency but in the end, elections trump virtually everything . On the some other hand, if elections are not held in a transparent way that promotes democracy, the disaster should not be viewed as dictatorship but instead it should be taken as a mistake that has been committed.Although fair elections form part of the virtues of effective governance, it should not be the only virtue that should be capitalized on. other(a) government yardsticks should be used in judging it. Such yardsticks let in civil, religious and economic liberties which form the basis of human dignity and autonomy. When a government extends these liberties to its people despite its limited democratic space, it cannot be categorise as a dictatorial government. Countries like Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore provide their citizens with a better life of happiness in spite of the limited political freedom.Countries such as China which have continued with repressive regimes liberty chit their citizens more economic liberty and autonomy in their current forms than they have ever offered in their history. Despite the achievements that China has achieved for its citizens such as economic freedom, much still enquires to be done to effect fitting change towards full liberalizing democracy (Zakaria 2008, 200). Zakariah concludes with a recommendation that there is need for countries to change their system of governance through constitutionalism.He says that when there is excessively much dependency on pure democracy, it affects transitional countries such that they lack constitutions which can be considered imaginative. Constitutionalism is a system of governance in which there are checks and balances which are meant to prevent stagnation and abuse of power by officials in governments. This is achieved through drafting a list of rights for the citizens and ensuring that they are granted to people by putting in place proper structures to ensure that they are not neglected by authorities.Various groups are also empowered to ensure that the officials obse rve the rule of law (Zakaria 2007). Just as an ambitious idea is do to counteract another ambitious idea, constitutions were made to cater for public passion and ensure effective governance. Despite its creation, roughly European countries at the moment have started looking at their constitutions suspiciously because of the wide range of rich unelected bodies that in betokenly vote, do checks and balances and federal arrangements to some(prenominal) formal and informal constitution.Such procedures which do not advocate for direct democracy are considered to be inauthentic because they muzzle the peoples voices (Zakaria 2008, 200). It is therefore important for either country to use the type of governance that suits them but should at the same time put the interests of its citizens ahead of any other issue. Bibliography Zakaria, F. 2008. The post-American world. New York W. W. Norton & Co. Zakaria, F. 2007. The Future of Freedom Illiberal country at Home and Abroad. New York