Brave New World Compared To Utilitarianism

valiant spick-and-span human race Comp ard To UtilitarianismThe story unfearing New existence presents us to the future area A.F (after Ford) where the government institutionalizes the advantages of engine room to the fullest. The reader is informed that valet beings are no longer produced by nature anymore. In A.F, technology is used to generate identical boys and girls and place in to tieres where they are programmed to be the most efficient at what they do. The utilitarian clear and stand New gentlemans gentleman twain claim that individualistic deliberates are irrelevant. Both the utilitarian and the philosophy of the existence state both rear the greatest good principle. On the other hand wedge would refute to brave out New innovation because it does not take up that line of descent of nature and or is not based off real human experiences. torpedo opposes to fond arrangements. The foundation of the world state in merry New World reveals similar philosoph y to the utilitarian view, but not completely.In the sense of wear New World and the utilitarian view, both cases take a stand point that reject individualisms. In brassy New World, there is no room from individual views or thoughts. In fact it is impossible for any case to even create their aver thought. From the second they are obtained from the test tube, babies are conditioned to have moderate thoughts and ideas. They are conditioned to however the progression of their function once labelled into the five categorize of castes. For example the Delta caste, once the babies reach the age of eighter months, they are conditioned to hate flowers and books. Babies were placed on the floor where they could exit a flower and book across the room. The director waited for the babies to show signs of contentment while playing with the flowers and books. A signal was given in which released a terrifying noise accompanied by an electric shock. Why go to the trouble of making it psych ologically impossible for deltas to like flowers? (Huxley, 22) The D.H.C replies by explaining that if the delta class was conditioned to like the nature (flower), less time would be sp decision in the factories where they are most efficient. A love of nature keeps no factory busy. (Huxley, 23)I like to compare the die hard new world to a business or a team. The old saying that reflects the homophile(a) new world could be said like this, Theres no I in TEAM. The brave new world is programmed around profit and readiness just as a business is structured around render and demand. In order for the world state to obtain its social last of social stability every caste has to work in agreement of their function. Therefore with each caste being conditioned / taught their function at any early stage will set aside or leave no room for their behavior to act out of concordance. In other words castes are conditioned to fear anything else then what their employment is. That is the secret of joy and virtue- liking what youve got to do. All conditioning aims at that making people like their unescapable social destiny (Huxley, 16) By obtaining their objectivity of social stability will then reinforce or create a happy community. This principle in terms refers to manufacturing plants greatest happiness principle. Both heroic New World and the utilitarian view character the greatest happiness principle.Both Mill and Brave New World reject the importance of individualism. It is wrong to make all individuals happy because it is around impossible to obtain such a thing. In doing so it would chip the natural balance of experiences. This is where Brave New World and the utilitarian view have their differences. In the utilitarian view Mill provides to tell us that individuals need to experience pain and fun. Huxley sets up a perfect world where no pain is experienced. Mill takes into account that it is nearly impossible suppress people from pain. If we did try to conce al worldly concern from pain this would distort humans nature itself. This is very important to a utilitarian because the ultimate end of happiness/pleasure come through pre existing experience. This is why Mill claims we should not have social arrangements.In the philosophy of Brave New World, alpha through gamma castes are given reason to why they should behave in a particular form or matter. Mill would oppose to the brave new world. I think mill would debate chapter two of the book where babies are being conditioned to fear books and nature. Mill would come to say that social stability comes through the natural public life of what humans learn through their confess experiences. In other words, move view of human nature itself should conduct people to work together. The brave new world would seem non-natural to Mill.Another difference between Brave New World and the utilitarian is on the topic of pleasures/happiness. In Brave New World, Huxely creates his perfect world where everyone is happy, but happiness is never defined. Brave New World only accompanies one type of pleasure, which is a physical pleasure. In the utilitarian view, Mill distinguished between two types of pleasure intellectual pleasures and bodily pleasures. This is to disprove that Brave New World practices a perfect utilitarian standpoint.When answering the question to whether Brave New World practices utilitarianism the answer is yes and no. However it does highlight the fundamentals of utilitarianism. Both Brave New World and utilitarianism do reject individualism and also evolve around the greatest good principle. It is more important to have command happiness for the greatest amount as it is to reach to social intent of social stability which creates for a happy community in Brave New World. But Brave New World lacks the course of nature. A utilitarian does oppose to social arrangement. It is important for humans to have their own experiences through the course of nature. Anot her aspect that Brave New World is missing is pain and the variety of pleasures. Brave New World only allows for one pleasure (bodily pleasures) and has an absence of pain. Where as a utilitarian fag end experience two types of pleasures (bodily and intellectual) and also experiences pain. Therefore Brave New World does not practice perfect utilitarianism.