'Is Mankind Harming the Environment? Essay\r'

'This paper forget establish whether soldiery has played a federal agency in harming the environment. It will talk in detail near the various compassionate activities that rent had an impact on our ingrained habitat and will also sustain specific examples of what we should expect in the future as a conduct of our activities and how we should deal with them. Mankind has several(prenominal) natural resources at his disposal. These include the oceans, atmosphere, woodwinds etc. either mis riding habit or overuse of these resources will get destroy the sustainability of these resources.\r\nThe fish population may mystify extinct, temper changes may result in an emergence in natural disasters, forests may not be replaceable etc. In short, abuse or improper use of the environmental resources may result in long term consequences for the entire realitykind. (Ostrom, Elinor et al: 2002) There is signifi stopt evidence to prove that mankind has indeed played a major role i n harming the environment. Most the earth’s fisheries urinate already been destroyed and the Amazon rain forest is also near destruction.\r\nâ€Å"Humans have destroyed more than(prenominal) than 30 per cent of the natural area since 1970 with serious depletion of the forest, freshwater system and marine systems on which intent depend. ” (Guardian: 1998) This combined with the persistent growth in babys room float emissions have resulted in a spacious increase in oz 1 layer depletion and global thaw. This in turn has resulted in temper change whole over the world causing an increase in the frequency of floods, droughts, hurricanes, extremities of weather, coastal erosion, melting glaciers etc.\r\nNo doubt global firming is the result of man’s own activities. Human activities which produce change magnitude amounts of babys room gases especially carbon dioxide from burning dodo sack are causing global heating system all across the world. Global warming has heretofore caused the ocean train to rise between intravenous feeding and eight inches during the last hundred years and either year seal level at once rises genius tenth of an inch. If mankind underwrites to emit greenhouse gases at the same rate it will result in serious environmental degradation as salutary as negative effects on human health.\r\n(Mank, Bradford: 2005) As Athanasiou and Baer put it, â€Å"Even if we move apace to cap the emission of greenhouse pollutants [a politically and diplomatically impossible scenario at present], the consequences of global warming will soon exit quite revolting, and even murderous, oddly for the poor and the vulnerable. And in the more likely oddball where we move slowly, the impacts will verge on catastrophic. ” maximum ploughshare towards environmental degradation comes from industrialized countries as about one-half of all greenhouse gas emissions come from these regions.\r\nFor example the United State s produces about one quarter of the world’s greenhouse gases. (Harris, capital of Minnesota: 2003) Climatologists suggest that average temperatures globally are evaluate to increase between three and ten degrees Fahrenheit(postnominal) by the next century. They also predict that modality change will also cause spick-and-span problems because of a persistent degradation of our ecosystem. Rising sea levels, severe natural disasters such as hurricanes, drought, floods, air travel pollution, scatter of diseases like malaria and cholera and other environmental disasters are all negative consequences of global warming.\r\n(Smith, Daniel S. : 2001) or so scientists have even predicted that human activities and increasing greenhouse gases will make the Earth so warm that the inhabitants will be unable to adapt to the changing climate. â€Å"The predicted results of this warming include melting of the polar icing the puck caps, flooding of coastal cities, massive experimenta l extinction of species, and the adulteration of civilization as we know it. ” (Parsons, Michael L. :1995) Increasing globalisation and man’s desire to accumulate more and more profit has also played a major role in harming the environment.\r\nIncreased use of energy has resulted in a widespread increase in greenhouse gas emission from dodo fuel use and this has resulted in an increase in global warming. If humans don’t hire any action, global warming will continue to increase. â€Å"The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that basic changes in personal consumption, mostly in the realms of electricity use, climate control, and transportation, can reduce the average American’s carbon emissions by roughly one-third, from 15,000 to 10,000 pounds per year.\r\nFurther reductions can be achieved through changing consumption patterns of nutrient and consumer goods, neither of which is included in those calculations. If combined with more efficient tec hnology, this sort of realignment of priorities would substantially reduce the nemesis of global warming, as well as grade of other environmental problems. ” (Smith, Daniel S. : 2001) Mankind’s level of water consumption is also constantly on the rise and it is predicted that water shortage may become mankind’s biggest problem in the twenty dollar bill first century.\r\nIt is estimated that up two thirds of the world’s countries will face moderate to high water shortages by 2025. This accompanied with increasing air, water and looseness pollution due to extensive industrial knowlight-emitting diodege has further deteriorated our environment. Greater use of fossil fuel and biomass burning and land clearing have led to a increase in nitrogen that has in turn, diminished the absorptive capacity of natural system.\r\n go the above evidence demonstrates mankind’s contribution to environmental deterioration, there are supporters who insist that man ha s played such a negative role. They bump that there hasn’t been such a major impact on the environment to begin with and that the consequences have been exaggerated to a large extent. Those who support globalization and deny its negative impact on the environment feel that stinting progress is closely conjugate to environmental performance but in a positive manner.\r\nThey feel that it is in fact sparing prosperity that may lead to a tidy environment. The logic behind this argument is that by adopting virgin and improved technologies, industries will have a less(prenominal) harmful impact on the environment and economic progress would enable countries to bring changes into their mode of surgery and save the environment from harm. (John, Detlef).\r\nOn the other spate a report by by the running(a) Group on Development and Environment in the Americas (U.S, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica and El-Salvador) shows that industrial development and globalization h as caused severe damage to the environment and highlights that the Americas now have growth problems with air, soil and water contamination as a result of globalization, urbanization and modernization. (Schalatek, Liane: 2004) Human activities have destroyed our natural habitat, have resulted in accelerating global warming and have contributed to air and water pollution.\r\nThe amount of greenhouse gases being emitted today is sufficient to cause goodish damage to the environment. The ozone layer is being depleted continuously, a number of pesticides and other organic pollutants have been spread globally endangering hormonal balances and the immune system in man and animals. Increasing dependence on natural resources has resulted in a rapid depletion of tropical forests and fisheries.\r\n umteen regions are facing problems of water shortage, resource depletion, climate change; risks from biological agents etc. (Dahl, Lynn: 1998) There has been a decline in plants, animals, insects and birds. According to the UN, the current extinction rate is up to 1000 times hurrying than in the past. It is estimated that around 844 animals and plants have disappeared in the last 500 years. â€Å"The global demand for biological resources now exceeds the planet’s capacity to renew them by 20%”. (Adam, David: 2006).\r\n'